Talk:Spermatocytogenesis

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Mdann52 in topic Link

Merge proposal

edit

This material could be covered in the main article of Spermatogenesis without losing any detail.Trashbird1240 (talk) 17:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The section "Spermatocytogenesis" should be merged with "Spermatogenesis" because it is impossible to separate the two topics. Spermatogenesis does not exist with spermatocytogenesis. Stages of spermatogenesis does not exist without spermatocytogenesis.

I would also like to propose that the subtopic, "Spermatidogenesis" be dropped and the short content be merged into the subtopic, "Spermiogenesis." My reason for this recommendation is the following: 1. There are 2,219 references in PubMed, when searching for "spermiogenesis' in the title/abstract 2. There are "0" references in PubMed, when searching for "spermatidogenesis' in the title/abstract 3. The following manuscript are written by experts in the field and use the term "spermiogenesis' [1] Rexhess (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2012 (UTC)Rex A. HessReply

References

  1. ^ Hermo L, Pelletier RM, Cyr DG and Smith CE (2009). Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 2: Changes in spermatid organelles associated with development of spermatozoa. Microsc Res Tech. PMID: 19941292 Hermo L, Pelletier RM, Cyr DG and Smith CE (2009). Surfing the wave, cycle, life history, and genes/proteins expressed by testicular germ cells. Part 3: Developmental changes in spermatid flagellum and cytoplasmic droplet and interaction of sperm with the zona pellucida and egg plasma membrane. Microsc Res Tech. PMID: 19941287 Cheng CY and Mruk DD (2011). Regulation of spermiogenesis, spermiation and blood-testis barrier dynamics: novel insights from studies on Eps8 and Arp3. Biochem J 435(3): 553-562. PMID: 21486226
edit

What am I seriously supposed to do? Linking to Gametocytogenesis which is disambiguation page. Should I remove the link?
117.198.178.102 (talk) 16:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

My advice is just to leave it like that - while this is discouraged, WP:IAR appears to apply here. Mdann52 (talk) 16:36, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply