Talk:Soviet Peace Committee

A fact from Soviet Peace Committee appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Soviet Peace Committee, a peace movement created and sponsored by the Soviet Union, criticized Western policies but defended Soviet ones?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/July.

Wikipedia

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Since Google Translate suggested the translation of the Russian Советский Комитет Защиты Мира as "Soviet Committee for the Protection of the World" and a common Polish name is "Soviet Committee of Defenders of Peace" (both which yield 0 hits in English) I looked up some other names:

Overall, the Soviet Peace Committee seems the most popular name, but care should be taken when doing research on it, as there seem to be quite a few alternative name translations. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Refs edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed the passage that 'No dissidents were admitted to the SPC'. Sovmir.co.uk is not really WP:RS, its more a self-published websites it seems. It fine for uncontroversial statements, but I think some other arguments should be backed up by more solid refs. The statement that no (i.e. zero) dissidents (which is a category which is not easily defined) is quite strong, especially since SPC had a mass membership. Evidently, there were some in the SPC who in some terms could be seen as 'dissidents' towards the final phase of SPC's existence. --Soman (talk) 22:11, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic