Talk:SoulCollage

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 16 May 2014 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Health and fitness

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Trademark symbol after 'SoulCollage' edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I'm an Italian facilitator of SoulCollage®, librarian and wikipedian, and I have just put the trademark symbol after SoulCollage in the Wikipedia page, but I cannot edit the title. I think it is important to use the ® symbol, as suggested by https://www.soulcollage.com/faq :

"Why is SoulCollage® trademarked? SoulCollage® is trademarked in the USA and abroad in order to assure that everyone is able to experience the process as it was originally intended. Trademarking the process ensured high standards for the brand and for the quality of the training of SoulCollage® Facilitators, who have permission to use the trademark in their workshops after completing a SoulCollage® Facilitator Training".

Maria Barbone (talk) 10:48, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Maria BarboneReply

Scam edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This who thing sounds like a scam to take advantage of people with mental illness. There is no scientific basis for any this brought forward. It is not clearly explained. It makes clinical claims without proofs. It is a sales add. It should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.84.1.2 (talk) 11:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic