Talk:Sonny Matula

Sonny Matula was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 27, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's "Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help!

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 2 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sonny Matula/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TheNuggeteer (talk · contribs) 06:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Flemmish Nietzsche (talk · contribs) 08:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your work, TheNuggeteer, but unfortunately I'm going to have to have to quickfail this GA nomination. It fits two of the criteria under Wikipedia:Good article criteria for an immediate failure:

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include {{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags (See also {{QF}})

This article is very short (only 341 words) and while that does not disqualify an article from being a Good Article, Good Articles should be well written and address the main aspects of the topic, and this article does unfortunately not do those things — I would suggest you expand the lead, and the article in general, to explain beyond just one sentence to explain the Notability and role of this person. As it is this article does not even say this man is a Filipino politician or what office(s) he holds in the lead, and spends only three sentences on his career. Please see MOS:LEAD and thoroughly read the Good Article criteria so that you know the standards Good Articles are expected to meet.

Secondly, this article's {{Notability}} tag has not been properly addressed — the citations still do not show and demonstrate the notability of this subject, and need to show significant coverage in sources independent of the subject.

This article did not receive a thorough review, and may not meet other parts of the good article criteria. I encourage you to remedy this problem (and any others) and resubmit it for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a Good article reassessment. Thank you for your work so far. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 08:16, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic