Talk:Solo: Songs and Collaborations 1982–2015
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Mz7 in topic Contested deletion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Micksheff (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
It is a factual page about an album which I am currently editing
- I too am a little iffy on whether this qualifies for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G11. My bar for "promotional language" is set higher than the language used in this article, which indeed is mostly factual information as opposed to promotional peacock language. Mz7 (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that this doesn't qualify for a WP:CSD#G11 speedy. And it doesn't fit A9 because the artist has an article (otherwise it might). But it does not clearly establish Notability. Not every album from a notable artist is itself notable, and as per WP:CRYSTAL unrelased albums like other future events need very clear evidence of notability. See also WP:NMUSIC. Micksheff, you need to find and cite additional reliable sources if you can, or this may be deleted in the near future. DES (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree with DESiegel's assessment. Best, Mz7 (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree that this doesn't qualify for a WP:CSD#G11 speedy. And it doesn't fit A9 because the artist has an article (otherwise it might). But it does not clearly establish Notability. Not every album from a notable artist is itself notable, and as per WP:CRYSTAL unrelased albums like other future events need very clear evidence of notability. See also WP:NMUSIC. Micksheff, you need to find and cite additional reliable sources if you can, or this may be deleted in the near future. DES (talk) 17:29, 3 October 2015 (UTC)