Talk:Smooth hammerhead

Smooth hammerhead has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 25, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sharks Mid‑importance

	Sharks portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Smooth hammerhead/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I made a few copy edits in reading the article. Feel free to revert any errors. Another interesting article by this editor. —Mattisse (Talk) 19:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Complies with relevant MoS
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No OR
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): Covers the broad aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias: Neutral
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.: Stable
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations!

—Mattisse (Talk) 19:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Article says one attack on human was fatal, cited source says otherwise. edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Funnily enough, I don't have access to the article since I'm writing here. 92.95.216.254 (talk) 05:11, 18 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic