 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Isn't this just Peter Thoeny advertising his product? Surely Situated Software is the common term for this
- Dear Mr. Anonymous: I respectfully disagree. I learned the term "situational application" at a talk by an IBM person at last year's AJAX World conference. This seems to be a well understood term in the industry. Lets ask Google: "Situational Applications" has 13,000 hits, "Situated Software" has 21,400 hits. If I am not mistaken, the term "Situated Software" was first coined by Clay_Shirky in 2004; I am not sure who coined the term "Situational Applications". Some related links based on a quick web search:
http://www.shirky.com/writings/situated_software.html (Clay_Shirky)
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Hinchcliffe/?p=50 (Dion Hinchcliffe)
http://esj.com/enterprise/article.aspx?EditorialsID=1766
http://elangogovind.wordpress.com/2006/02/10/what-is-a-situational-application/
http://www-142.ibm.com/software/sw-lotus/events/govfor.nsf/wdocs/ls2007ad
-- Peter Thoeny - 01:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Mr. Anonymous. These articles share one thing in common -- they have to explain what situational applications are. Some of them even use phrases like "The loosely accepted term situational applications." This is certainly far from an industry standard term.--Ozymandias42 (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
- So why is this obvious hijacking persisting? Since 2004, I have heard a lot about situated software, and I think it deserves a Wikipedia article -- I don't care about the derived, but different IBM term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.137.174.145 (talk) 22:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)