Talk:Short track speed skating at the 2002 Winter Olympics – Men's 1500 metres

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Oncamera in topic James Hewish incident

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Short track speed skating at the 2002 Winter Olympics – Men's 1500 metres. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 3 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

James Hewish incident edit

This discussion will be applied to the following articles:

@188.65.246.175: I still believe that Kim Dong-sung unfairly lost the gold medal thanks to James Hewish's misjudgement and Apolo Ohno's simulated foul that led to it. But I tried my best at maintaining NPOV while I was revising the paragraphs in question days ago to best describe what actually happened (or what appeared to happen) back in 2002. If you still think my writing was biased, why don't you reword them to adhere to what you think was neutral, instead of reverting them outright?

Also, while I was on it, I replaced some dead and/or questionable Korean language sources with remaining and/or credible ones.

And I moved the detailed writings about the incident from the Apolo Ohno article to Short track speed skating at the 2002 Winter Olympics – Men's 1500 metres because I think it's better suited in the article about the event, while the article about the American skater can focus on Ohno's feelings and later remarks about the incident. --175.124.86.89 (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't see a reason to remove information that pertains to Ohno from his article to another, especially an article that is hardly read at all. In the past 30 days, Ohno's article pageview count was over 40,000, this article has just over 200 (and that includes 70+ that can be attributed to recent activity leading up to this article).  oncamera  (talk page) 07:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Oncamera: Viewcounts don't matter. It'd be awkward to have other athletes' reactions about the controversy in an article mainly about Ohno. Also, we can direct all the attentions using the likes of {{main}} and {{see also}} (which I've already placed). --175.124.86.89 (talk) 10:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Go ahead and keep edit warring over something that no one cares about, adding a link to this page won't draw interest.  oncamera  (talk page) 14:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)Reply