Talk:Sheppard–Towner Act

Latest comment: 5 months ago by 158.62.187.75 in topic No mention of US Treasury?

Sources and Research edit

Sources for this article are insufficient. Source provided is:
Lecture 1, Spring 2009, Military Medical History, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, unpublished work in the public domain
This source does not conform to Wikipedia guidelines:

  • Sources should include the work, its author, and publisher. No author listed.
  • The first paragraph, describing the act's creation, is not cited.
  • The second paragraph advances a particular point of view, which, without access to the source, violates verifiability and constitutes original research and/or synthesis. From Wikipedia:No_original_research: "Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. This includes unpublished facts, arguments, speculation, and ideas; and any unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position."

Public domain or not, as an unpublished source this information does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion. Please update the article with published sources and remove all unverifiable claims. See Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No_original_research for further details. Glacialfury (talk) 18:41, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Work needed edit

I've just restructured this entry, edited it for clarity, and marked sections that need further work. The references mentioned in Further Reading are a good place to start for expanding this entry's content and beefing up its citations. ---Shane Landrum (cliotropic | talk | contribs) 20:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

title edit

Shouldn't the act be spelled with a hyphen rather than a dash: i.e.the Sheppard-Towner Act, rather than the Sheppard–Towner Act? Wormcast (talk) 21:03, 29 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

No mention of US Treasury? edit

Why does the article not mention that the US Treasury holds your birth certificate as a bond?2601:806:4301:C100:41BC:DA4:A5AA:B476 (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Because that's all nonsense?
This is why I came to this page: to see if someone had addressed this.
Here is a nutball website teaching this: http://articleatlas.com/Birth-certificate-is-an-unrevealed-trust-instrument.html
Someone needs to prove that this act has NOTHING to do with birth certificates as bonds, and all the other sovereign citizen garbage. 158.62.187.75 (talk) 23:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Revisions edit

I revised most sections, expanded content, and added citations. I did not touch the "infant mortality" section, although I think it could still be significantly streamlined. -- Raaboyl (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply