Talk:Shahbajwan

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

India: Cities Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 3 July 2016 edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move. I will, however, create the proposed title as a redirect. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Shahbazwan → Shabajwan – The spelling of the title is incorrect real name is Shabajwan instead of Shabazwan.Prove-[[1]] NaiyarIm (talk) 03:17, 3 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 13:23, 12 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Comment: Looking at a quick Google count, excluding Wikipedia and mirrors: 23 results for Shahbazwan, 9 results for Shahbajwan, 5 results for Shabajwan, 3 results for Shabazwan – I honestly can't see the third-most used spelling as being the "correct" one in this case. Furthermore, I should note that User:NaiyarIm/Imnaiyar lists this as his city of birth on his userpage and spells it as Shahbazwan, so we might also be dealing with WP:COI matters. ONR (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic