Talk:Sex Panic!

Rating

I rated this article as C class. I think the content and sourcing are B level, so some rearranging and MoS changes would get it there. Some suggestions:

• Merge small sections, eg naming, which is unlikely to ever grow would be better in the origins section rather than a subsection.

• Done Gonzonoir (talk) 20:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Merge amins & activities for now, until they grow.

• Done Gonzonoir (talk) 20:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• There is an {{LGBT rights}} template that can go at the top of the lead to make it seem less empty.

• Done Gonzonoir (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Also an {{LGBT}} navbox that can go under the external links.

• Done Gonzonoir (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• The cquote template is for pull quotes. Normal quotes can use {{quote}} or block quotes.

• Done Gonzonoir (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• I created a capitalisation redirect, might want to check if others are needed.

• To this article, you mean? It now has Sex Panic, SexPanic, SexPanic!, and Sex panic! to choose from, as well as the auto redirects when initial caps are missing, so I think it's pretty much covered now. Gonzonoir (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

• Is there an organisation Logo? Would certainly be ok for fair use.
• Any other free images? The founder? Their main meeting place? Any of their activities?

YobMod 09:38, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks for taking the time to rate this, Yobmod, and for the very useful suggestions for improvement. I'll have a crack at the enhancements you've suggested, and see if I can find any other editors who want to do so too. Trying to track down images with certain obvious search terms has proved... hair-raising, heh, but maybe I'll turn on safesearch and give it another try. Or just wait til I'm not in public :)

OK if I resubmit for rating at WPLGBT when it's in better shape? Gonzonoir (talk) 10:08, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Sure thing. The project can only assess up to B class, and i think if everything i wrote above is done, this might pass GA, but is better to reassess before going through GAN (which can take 40+ days).

Q: Do they still exist? If so, they must have a web-presence somewhere. A link in the article would be a good idea if so.YobMod 11:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

This is the thing: I couldn't find one (this article itself has now nudged onto the first page of Ghits for the term), which makes me suspect the organization is defunct, but I can't find proof either way. I was planning to try to contact some of the members, in case any of them can point me to further information - I thought they might be a good potential source for images, too - but I need to get clear on WP's policy for donating content first. Planning to read up on that next. Gonzonoir (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Defunct, per "Regulating Sex: The Politics of Intimacy and Identity", published in 2005.[1]. John Nagle (talk) 05:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Images

I'm trying to find a decent image or two to add to this article, but coming up nearly blank. There's what looks like a probable old logo here, but that instance alone wouldn't meet verifiability standards and I wouldn't know where to begin justifying the use or investigating copyright. So that looks like a bust.

A few individual pictures of founder members are available, so that's an a possibility, though I'm slightly concerned about WP:UNDUE. Anyone have any other thoughts? Gonzonoir (talk) 11:23, 22 March 2009 (UTC)