|WikiProject Computing||(Rated Start-class)|
"a grammar" <-- doesn't it seem ironic to have poor grammar, while talking ABOUT grammar? Or perhaps this has some alternate meaning I'm not able to see. Anyone have thoughts on this? --126.96.36.199 05:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- The word "Grammar" is used with a definite or indefinite article when discussing a specific grammar used to describe a language. Used in this way "a grammar" basically means "a set of rules used to describe a language", so for instance we have books such as "A Latin Grammar" written by Charles Bennet in 1895 which lists and explains the grammatical rules used to write Latin. The word, "grammar" may also be used without an article when discussing grammar in general or as a field of study. Both uses are grammatical in their proper places. Read the grammar article for instances of both usages. The SEQUITUR article discusses an algorithm which generates grammars (in the former sense). So its use of the words, "a grammar", is perfectly grammatical. -- Derek Ross | Talk 15:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|This topic is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.|
The section or sections that need attention may be noted in a message below.
This article lacks any mention or analysis of the mathematical properties of this method in running time, or optimality of the deduced form. — MaxEnt 19:10, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- Now I notice "linear time and space" which I guess is all that needs to be said about runtime, even though some linear algorithms are not especially fast (e.g. linear in the number of symbols processed, but non-linear in the number of distinct symbols in the alphabet). — MaxEnt 19:15, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
The abstract synopsis for Identifying Hierarchical Structure in Sequences: A linear-time algorithm styles the name as SEQUITUR (and not just on first use). — MaxEnt 19:18, 28 April 2018 (UTC)