Talk:Sequential intercept model

(Redirected from Talk:Sequential Intercept Model)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cameron Dewe in topic Addressing article issues


Untitled

edit

Hi Violet, Please add an infobox. If you can't find an appropriate template, please leave a message for the administrators in your talk page.

Hello Maryam. It is almost impossible for me to find a infobox template on the psychology or criminology related topics. So I added a sidebar, I wonder if that is okay? Xdarkfantasyx (talk) 14:08, 29 May 2019 (UTC)VioletReply

Hi Violet, Has your article been reviewed? It doesn't have any traces of a review (no rating or templates)!!! Have you deleted those templates?Maryam.alavinia (talk) 13:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Addressing article issues

edit

This article's original contributor, @Xdarkfantasyx, seems to have edited Wikipedia mostly to contribute this article and no longer appears to be active. That makes addressing some of the existing issues with the article challenging to address. However, I will set them out as listed in the clean-up tag I added to the top of the article.

  1. This article is currently an orphan article, and has probably been one since its inception, and certainly since 2021. All that is required to fix this is to find another appropriate main/article-space article that will link to this one.
  2. This article uses external links within the body text of the article. These links will take the reader off Wikipedia to another website, if they follow the link to seek more information. Such links should be replaced by a corresponding Wikipedia article, or else become a citation or footnote. The external links can be put in the "'External links"section of the article, too.
  3. The lead section needs improvement. It should answer at least some, if not all, of the following key questions: Who? What? Where? When? and Why? After reading the lead section, I am left wondering Where is the Sequential Intercept Model used?, What is its purpose?, When it it applicable? and Why was it developed in the first place? There seems to be a certain amount of assumed knowledge that one needs to know about this subject before reading the full article, to understand it. Unfortunately most readers will know nothing about the subject, so they need some explanation to orientate themselves.
  4. This article has been written as if the model is relevant globally, yet the model appears to have been developed within the context of the United States justice system. This raises the question of is the model applicable elsewhere in the world and, if so, where else is it used. Also, where else in the world is it not used because those places have a different justice system system or a different model for dealing with people having mental health issues, or confront the problem in a different way.

Feel free to deal with any problem on the list, but I suspect dealing with them in order is the best way to go. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 00:01, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply