Talk:Sejm of the Grand Duchy of Posen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chris troutman (talk · contribs) 03:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   I'm deeply concerned that this article relies so heavily on one source. I'm not sure if that is a fatal defect. I'm going to ask for a second opinion. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:56, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   I haven't seen much English-language writing on this subject. This covers the major aspects discussed in the literature. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   I think images from the commons could be used, even if somewhat tangential. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Heavy reliance on a single source is permitted for GA. More sourcing will be required for A-level and FA review. While I would like to see images, there aren't any that are exactly applicable to the topic and therefore not per se necessary. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)