This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
It's not mentioned (tho perhaps it should be), here, Irish 24h GA met a Fed Irish rgt, the 69h NY (later 27th "New York" Inf Div). Trekphiler 08:49, 28 December 2005 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Shouldn't this page be renamed to Second Battle of Fredericksburg to be more consistent with the other ACW articles, like the naming of Second Battle of Chattanooga and so on? If there is no objection I'll move it there in a few days. Kresock (talk) 01:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I added the NPS battle summary and changed the first one, which had been erroneously attributed to the NPS, to the correct source. The link, of course, stayed the same. CsikosLo (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
Virtually all the ACW article use the expression "National Park Service battle description" because NPS hosts the site and CWSAC is not a defined abbreviation anyone outside our community would recognize. Hal Jespersen (talk) 21:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
