Talk:Sea lane
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Tamzin in topic "Sea route" listed at Redirects for discussion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Untitled
editThe claims of the origins in the history section are unsubstantiated, I've added citation tags. These facts need to be supported or they should be removed since I have documented contrary information about the origins of sea lanes, which I will add shortly (with refs).
Decisions
editIt's still not clear who decided of the sea lanes, neither when nor where.--Laurentleap (talk) 12:21, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
"Sea route" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sea route. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 26#Sea route until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin (she/they, no pref.) | o toki tawa mi. 22:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)