Talk:Sea cadets

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page has been created as a part of an ongoing project to render Sea Cadets a useful article by splitting it and creating this disambiguation page Fiddle Faddle 19:54, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Double Redirects - a lot of work remains on double redirects. Please pick some up and even be bold and disambiguate them Fiddle Faddle 08:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Alphabetical order? edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't feel strongly about it, but I put the links in alphabetical order, sorted by Nation and then by Organisation name. Not sure why the order was altered? I'm not going to have a battle about it and start reverting :), but I wanted you to know my rationale (Anal retentive, perhaps?)

If this page gets long, surely full Alpha oprder is better?

Fiddle Faddle 07:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic