List Class? edit

This is really a list? I dunno, it seems to have had an awful lot of prose and sections before I touched it. I think it's more of just a straight-up article, with some list-like elements. CzechOut | 03:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think these TV season articles tread a very fine line between a list and an article. Lost (season 3) for example, contains a very large amount of text and is still classed as a list also. I think they are primarily supposed to function as an episode list. Daniel99091 | talk 05:51, 27 August 2008 (UTC).Reply

Critical Response edit

In the Critical Response section, the article claimed

The show is still criticised for its "simplicity and stiffness".

However, when one actually reads the reference from which this quote was taken, it's clear that the author is quoting from other reviewers of the first series, and has little to do with his actual opinion of the second series. Rewriting it to more accurately reflect the meaning of the cited source. CzechOut | 06:01, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:Meettheproducers1.jpg edit

The image Image:Meettheproducers1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:32, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply