Talk:Scirus
Latest comment: 14 years ago by 222.64.23.7 in topic My opinion about the engine against Google scholar
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Like a product brochure edit
This article reads like a product brochure.
Comparison with CiteSeer and Google Scholar edit
An anon editor has requested a comparison of Scirus with CiteSeer and Google Scholar be added. Nurg (talk) 06:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Physical contacting info.....??? edit
--222.64.23.7 (talk) 05:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
If it can be contacted via Elsevier, then the website should be co-logoed to maintain its integrity.
My opinion about the engine against Google scholar edit
The search criteria are better designed than Google scholar. However, the search mode is worse than Google scholar as the settings are always fliking back to default ones--222.64.23.7 (talk) 06:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
In terms of the speed of eye's screening to the search results, the Google scholar is far better than this service--222.64.23.7 (talk) 06:42, 25 January 2010 (UTC)