Talk:International sanctions against Iran
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Sanctions against Iranian scientists has been deleted. Will its contents be merged into this article?
editThis article has been deleted, so I am now unable to access its revision history or view its contents. Will we be permitted to undelete this article so that it can be merged into Sanctions against Iran? Jarble (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Citation re U.S. sanctions
editThe section "Reasons for Sanctions" quotes a U.S. State Department web page. However, neither the current page nor the Obama Administration's legacy page contain the quoted statement. I believe the quote is accurate, but no longer valid. Maybe if someone can find an archived version that contains this quote it can be retained as a historical purpose of sanctions, but in any case it is no longer current. NPguy (talk) 02:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Proposed merge with United States sanctions against Iran
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
why are there two articles about this? Seraphim System (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - I'm shocked there aren't any other votes on this yet. Anyway, I lean towards Wiki-Separatism so take this with a grain of salt, but I think both articles have more than enough content to be separate. It would be more convenient for a reader looking for the specific US sanctions against Iran to go to that article, just as it would be more convenient for a reader looking for sanctions against Iran from any other country to come to this article. Nanophosis (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Actually I think the U.S. sanctions article should be merged with this one. One article on this subject is all that is needed. 50.111.48.95 (talk) 21:44, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- I agree. PrussianOwl (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- I also support a merge. --Wq639 (talk) 18:35, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- I agree. PrussianOwl (talk) 19:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose merger. The main reason is because US sanctions against Iran quite differ from UN endorsed sanctions against Iran, the later sanctions being discussed more broadly in this article.Davidbena (talk) 15:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. The merger makes prolongation the article. M1nhm (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose. "Proposed since March 2018," should be closed-out. X1\ (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Some groups such as Freedom Movement of Iran[1] or CNN contributors[2] claim the sanctions are the reason of medicine shortage in Iran however the statistics of Customs of Islamic republic for the year 2013-2014 (before JCPOA) showing almost 1.5 million ton medicines of a single group(tariff) "Dietary supplements for human" is imported only from USA by direct contract[3] and during the other years the importation from USA has been continued.[4] Also Sadeq Larijani, in opposing to INSTEX, approved the food and medicines were not prohibited,[5] however official reports of Iran are showing medicine shortage even for simple Iranian productions.[6][7] BBC Persian relates the problem to the financial transfer limitations but it doesn't have consonancy with the customs statistics.[8] And now official news says Iran is exporting medicines to Venezuela.[9]
@NPguy: Hi there, please describe more, what's the meaning of "this is all incoherent gibberish" in this text (POLITELY) and provide the relative wiki policy? thanks --Factrecorder (talk) 07:53, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
- You've made my case. I don't know what point you're trying to make. In any case it looks like an attempt at original research. Find a source that makes whatever case you're trying to make, rather than stitching the argument together yourself. NPguy (talk) 03:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ نامه نهضت آزادى ايران به احزاب كشورهاى مختلف جهان پيرامون اقدامات دولت آمريكا عليه ايران, contains En translation
- ^ "Iranians are paying for US sanctions with their health". CNN. Archived from the original on 22 Feb 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
- ^ "آمارواردات تعرفه، گمرک و کشورهای شرح ذیل طی سال 1392". Customs of Iran. Archived from the original on 24 Feb 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
Row 8874
- ^ "Statistics of 2017-2018". Customs of Iran. Archived from the original on 24 Feb 2019. Retrieved 24 February 2019.
- ^ "منتقد مجرم نیست". IRNA. Archived from the original on 23 Feb 2019. Retrieved 23 February 2019.
اصلاً مگر دارو و غذا تحریم بودهاست که حالا این سازوکار مالی را به عنوان یک امتیاز القا کنند؟
- ^ "Shortage of Iranian medicines in North Khorasan". ISNA. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
- ^ "Medicine shortage news". Parliamentary news agency (The house of people). Retrieved 25 February 2019.
- ^ "دشواری کمبود دارو در ایران". BBC Persian. Archived from the original on 24 Feb 2019. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
- ^ "Iran ready to export medicine, medical equipment to Venezuela". Mehrnews. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
Bank of Kunlun
editNew York Times [1]: This is what China National Petroleum Corp. did in 2009 when it bought a small bank in China’s northwestern province of Xinjiang and renamed it Bank of Kunlun. The bank helped Iran conduct hundreds of millions of dollars worth of transactions.
Are China National Petroleum Corp and Bank of Kunlun mentioned in this article? I didn't find them with a quick search. If not, they should probably be added. Thanks. –Novem Linguae (talk) 02:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)