Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022

Emerging artists

67 artists are in bold, while only 66 qualified and I can't manage to find the one that shouldn't be. Also, the link to the "convocations" has already been changed so it an archive may be needed. Thank you Yoyo360 (talk) 14:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Addressed. Grk1011 (talk) 18:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2022/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 08:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

• I'll review over the next few days. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 08:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Hi @The C of E: checking in just in case you forgot about this. No rush. Grk1011 (talk) 16:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

• Are there any links for the writers in the opening paragraph?

• Added two interlanguage links. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Can we link the years for the 3 consecutive Austrian performances, for consistency

• Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Any subsequent reasons why the emerging acts were absent?

• None of the available sources explained why. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Was there any subsequent punishment for the jury scandal beyond using aggregate scores?

• It seems the aggregate scores were the only penalty based on the available sources. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Is ESCToday a print source? IF not, it shouldn't be in WP:ITALICS
  • Same for Eurovoix

• Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• There are multiple WP:BLUE links for SMRTV in the references

• This is ok per MOS:REPEATLINK. Citations are not read in order of appearance. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Sources 17, 37 and 54, i'm not sure WikiBlogs is an WP:RS

• This is reliable source that just so happens to have blog in its name. The site lists their editorial policies, key staff and their credentials, significance in the field, etc. [1], [2]. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Source 55, Out is a print source and should be italicised

• Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• Source 56, Metro is considered generally unreliable under WP:RSP

• Done. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

• • @Grk1011: It looks more or less ready, just needs the above issues addressed and it should be ready. Feel free to ping me once they are done. Apologies for the delay. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 06:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
    • @The C of E: Thank you for the review! I believe I've made all the requested edits, with comments above. Grk1011 (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
      • Indeed you have. I can pass this now. Well done! The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 21:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)