Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2000 Summer Olympics/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 19:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Will be reviewing this article as part of a GAN sweep. Comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 19:16, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Lead

edit
  • Wikilink Kim Collins and Velma Bass in the lead

Background

edit
  • "Saint Kitts and Nevis made its Olympic debut in 1996 sending ten athletes." - better: Saint Kitts and Nevis made their first appearance at the Olympics in 1996, sending ten athletes
  • " Velma Bass previously competed at the 1996 Summer Olympics in the women's 4 × 100 meters relay." - change to partook for variety

Athletics

edit
  • "This was the second Olympic appearance for both Collins and Bass, both" - comma inbetween the words "Bass" and "both" needs to be replaced with a semi colon
  • "Collins competed in both the 100 meter and 200 meter." - Collins competed in both the 100 meter and 200 meter dashes
  • "Collins finished fifth in the semifinals for the 200 meter event, failing to advance to the finals." - Collins placed fifth in the semifinals for the 200 meter event, and thus failed to advance to the finals.
  • "and eighth in the semi finals for the 200 meter." - 200 meter sprint

Good work on this so far. You're on the right track for on getting this series of articles into a Good Topic. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 20:20, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply