Talk:SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop

Not true

"Novell Linux Desktop 9 is essentially SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 with Ximian Desktop as the user interface."

I disagree. I know that NLD9 wouldn't exist if it wasn't for SLES9 and it borrows so much from it, but I know that it was engineered differently. It would've been true if it was "NLD9 is a re-engineered version of SLES9". I don't qualify (yet) as a Linux expert but I'll bet a SUSE expert can confirm my point here (that NLD9 is not essentially SLES9). There is a good review posted somewhere in the Web so I'll try to post the link later. --Unbreakable_MJ 23:54, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

SLED 10

Can someone update this page to SLED 10 ..

• I have attempted to provide a basis for this on Nov 6, 2006. --User:Thaeger

NEW ARTICLE

I have created the article entitled SUSE Linux Distibutions in order to provide an up to date resource for SUSE linux. I am a firm advocator for SUSE and hope that the general wikipedian public agrees on this article becoming the proper article for SUSE Linux. As of now I am on SUSE IRC channels trying to get professionals to clean up this article. To vote on whether this should be main page leave a yes or no comment under this comment --H a m m o 09:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Two Complaints

• where's the infobox? (I'm pretty sure there used to be one)
• The current version is SP1 (Not sure that info is listed)

I am very interested in collaborating with you and anybody else on this article (That's my image for XGL). SLED is the only OS i use on my personal time, and i feel i have enough knowledge to help with questions.--Taylor 20:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Have used openSUSE 10.2 then openSUSE 10.3 and now SLED 10 sp2. Each installed fine.

Now upgrading to SLED: (a) SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 Service Pack 2 - For x86 (b) SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 Service Pack 2 - For AMD64 adn Intel64

Both work with AsRock ConRoe1333-D667 motherboard and Intel Conroe Core 2 Duo processor E6750@2.66GHZ, being NON-Technical when SLED disk arrived I installed the on top x86 which GNOME system monitor says is SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 10 (i586)

Now about to install Intel64.

errors are mine ;-) Pwparker (talk) 00:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Pwparker

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725060409/http://desktoplinux.com/news/NS8193213538.html to http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS8193213538.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070104235209/http://www.infoworld.com/slideshow/2007/01/29-2007_technology-7.html to http://www.infoworld.com/slideshow/2007/01/29-2007_technology-7.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to https://susestudio.com/a/RuZCV2/tinysoft-com
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060104183404/http://www.novell.com/success/whitfield_school.html to http://www.novell.com/success/whitfield_school.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725060409/http://desktoplinux.com/news/NS8193213538.html to http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS8193213538.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 25 December 2017 (UTC)