Talk:Sørkjosen Airport/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Arsenikk in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 11:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • "The airport has a 880-by-30-meter (2,890 by 98 ft) asphalt runway aligned 15–33." What is meant by " aligned 15-33?
  • Source needed for destination table.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 12:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Check the coordinates, I see just a road by water on google street view. I corrected them, don't worry.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 16:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Arsenikk seems to have disappeared suddenly, so this'll have to be closed. Wizardman 17:52, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'm going to pass it, they're very minor points, which I hope he'll address when he decides to return. I've told him not to nominate articles again if he knows he is going to be absent for a prolonged period, but something might have cropped up which he hadn't anticipated..


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Passed as a GA, but I want to see these minor issues settled once Arsenikk returns.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 14:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've fixed the two issues; coordinates seem to check out okay for me. Thank you for the review. Arsenikk (talk) 22:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Reply