Talk:Runway incursion

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 April 2020 and 13 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Daniel Orme1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:26, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Cleanup needed

There's a lot of undigested material in here, some of it possibly (the doctoral thesis matter?) copyviols. I don't have time (I'm on break here), but somebody needs to tighten and clean this considerably.--Orange Mike 15:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Broken Links

The two links to videos in this line are broken. Youtube states that the videos have been removed by the user.

This methodology was investigated by the FAA FAA Pulselite Video A video example of the system in use in the manner of Qantas Airlines can be found here Runway Incursion

--149.171.232.54 (talk) 03:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Runway incursion does not equal ATC error

A collision or near-collision on a runway due to ATC error is NOT runway incursion. This is ATC error. Runway incursion explicitly requires that something is not authorized to be on the runway. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 17:55, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Dondegroovily I'm glad I read this before adding Tenerife and the US Airways 1493 / Skywest 5569 disasters. Both are technically not incursions by this definition. 👍 Pdxgimlet Talk to me 03:48, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Yan, Boufous & Molesworth (2023)

Looks like a useful paper: "A systematic review of pilot-related runway incursions from a human factors perspective". Yan, Boufous & Molesworth (2023): [1] 205.239.40.3 (talk) 11:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)