This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've added the phrase 'training consultancy' but linked it as [[Training]] [[consultancy]]. Would this be better as [[Training Consultancy]] - comments needed! 82.109.66.148 (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Was there a rationale for removing the information regarding the ANZAC mutiny, the mention of the pothumously published memoirs of a witness to said mutiny listed as a reference, and the link to an article on that topic, and deleting that article other article? Aodhdubh (talk) 19:28, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
