Talk:Royal North Devon Yeomanry

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Name in 1915 edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

It seems that the regiment was still called "Royal North Devon Hussars" when it fought at Gallipoli in 1915, as evidenced from the badge inscribed with that name on the monument in Exford Church to Major Morland Greig (1864-1915), of Edgcott, Exford, killed in action at Gallipoli. I have attempted to split the article into sections under its various names.(Lobsterthermidor (talk) 12:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC))Reply

Re "Royal North Devon Hussars" - that is entirely possible, but Mills, Mileham, James do not indicate this. Have you got any other sources?

As to the split into sections by regimental title: I do not think this is very successful, notably Devonshire Regiment of Yeomanry Cavalry and Royal North Devonshire Regiment of Yeomanry Cavalry (1856) consist of just a single sentence between them. Unless there is a realistic possibility that these will be significantly expanded, I cannot see this working. How about adding a separate section "Regiment Name" or some such instead?

By the way, the sections are now all out of kilter, from 2/1st Royal North Devon Yeomanry onwards. Can you fix? Hamish59 (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

This makes clear that the regiment was the Royal North Devon Yeomanry (see page 2151): Order in Council dated 19 March 1908 "No. 28121". The London Gazette (invalid |supp= (help)). 20 March 1908. Note as counter examples Lancashire Hussars and South Nottinghamshire Hussars. Hamish59 (talk) 13:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

It is a bit confusing. That's all I have to contribute. The mural monument in Exford Church to Major Morland Greig (1864-1915), of Edgcott, Exford, killed in action at Gallipoli in 1915 does seem pretty credible, certainly a valid source. I can supply a full size image if it would help. Perhaps in some rural areas there was a fondness for the old name and a reluctance to modernise it? (Lobsterthermidor (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC))Reply

Indeed, Lobster. Or simply a lack of precision. "Everyone" would have known what was meant by "North Devon Yeomanry" or "North Devon Hussars" and would or could have used the terms interchangeably. Only becomes a problem when people confuse, for example, Sherwood Foresters and Sherwood Rangers. I am not doubting your source, or it authenticity. Hamish59 (talk) 19:40, 14 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic