Talk:Royal Bengal Airline

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 84.143.187.49 in topic partisan statement

Notes edit

  • 2 DHC8-100s purchased. First to be delivered on 2007-06-01
  • Investment opportunities close on 2007-05-15
  • Domestic & Regional launch expected in June 2007

Unusual activities edit

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ibzi dat (talkcontribs)

The registration of AirSylhet as a trademark by RBA could suggest a collaboration between the two companies. Surely, registering of a logo can only be done by the holders of the IPR to the design. However, it is a low-res image as compared to the RBA logo which is high-res.

They are very interesting facts that should be presented in the article, but with proper attribution. If anyone can find more info that can be used to verify these findings, please discuss them here.

Thanks. → AA (talkcontribs) — 08:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can you refrain from mentioning direct people's names especially if they do not have any direct links with the company and alegations. All alegations are simply conjuctive and an issue that should be discussed privately between the two organisations involved. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.59.238 (talkcontribs)
I've removed the DNS stuff as there is no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing. However, the trademark issue is a verifiable fact since "R B Airline" is listed as the applicant. If anyone has more info please add. → AA (talkcontribs) — 08:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply
Trademark info is encyclopaedic material and will eventually be incorporated into the article once the facts (as discussed above) are known. For the moment it is sufficient to refer to the information in the EL section. → AA (talkcontribs) — 11:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have incorporated this info with a NPOV perspective into both articles. → AA (talkcontribs) — 13:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

partisan statement edit

"...to alleviate the misery of passengers enduring a sub-standard service from Biman Bangladesh Airlines. "

This clearly partial sentence is not acceptable unless attributed to a source. Mark 84.143.187.49 (talk) 18:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply