Talk:Rogue Planet (novel)

READS LIKE AN ADVERTISMENT

!!!

There's also an audio book version released on 6 cassettes I think —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCataphract (talk • contribs) 17:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rogue Planet book cover.jpg

Image:Rogue Planet book cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Ad copy

The plot summary reads like ad copy and is the goof really a goof? Lots42 (talk) 00:12, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

The merge thingy

I protest the merge, it's a high-selling hardback-paperback novel in one of the best known fandoms. The mere fact is is a high selling novel is enough to merit an article. The rest is just gravy. Mmm, gravy. Lots42 (talk) 02:18, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

No merge is proposed, I proposed the article for deletion. Please note that WP:BK shows the requirements for notability required for a book to be included in Wikipedia. I could find not significant 3rd party coverage that would satisfy WP:BK when I proposed the article. Please add anything you find to the article as a reference... -- RP459 ^Talk/_{Contributions} 02:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Well, that's egg on my face. But my reasons against the merge I imagined still stand re: the deletion. Lots42 (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rogue Planet (novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060511232743/http://cargobay.starwars.com/webapps/cargobay/item-detail/1077 to http://cargobay.starwars.com/webapps/cargobay/item-detail/1077

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 24 January 2018 (UTC)