Talk:Robert L. Eichelberger/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Hawkeye7 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: DCI2026 (talk · contribs) 01:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC) I'll begin reviewing this article at some point this week, hopefully sooner rather than later. dci | TALK 01:48, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Early life edit

Re: "He grew up on the 235 acres (95 ha) family farm", it is traditional to refer to the "acres" in the singular when attached to an object such as "farm", eg. "the 200 acre farm". Downsize43 (talk) 01:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  • It's just the template. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:34, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

World War I edit

Last para. The sentence "The American Expeditionary Force Siberia was withdrawn in April 1920." should be the last one in the para, not the first. Downsize43 (talk) 01:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Checklist edit

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The review is incredibly late; throughout my readings of the article I found no egregious or even remotely notable errors.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: