Talk:River Landing
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Victoria Bridge a dealbreaker?
editMy parents, who live in Saskatoon, tell me that the closure of the Traffic Bridge and the subsequent talk of replacing it was actually considered a dealbreaker for River Landing, and this might have been a reason why the city chose to simply repair it (besides the cheaper price tag). Can anyone confirm that development of River Landing hinges at all on the bridge? 23skidoo 14:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
The city owns most of River Landing. It sold one lot to a developer who is putting in a hotel/spa. The arts centre is an existing group in town this is building it's part of the complex. The rest of the development is in the hands of the city. --M@sk 00:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- I think my parents were talking about the hotel/spa developer. Basically as they heard the story, he was going to pull out of the project because the bridge was considered a selling feature. He may or may not have had something to do with the roundabout that was built at Spadina Cres. If my parents heard about it, it must have been something that was reported in the local media, but something like that needs to be cited before it's added to the article proper. 23skidoo 03:15, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The developer (who is actually a SHE) pulled out because of a lack of tax incentives expected to be offered by he city, and some pretty nasty objections to people who didn't want the project to go through. Rising costs and lack of skilled laour contributed. (DAG)
Fair use rationale for Image:River landing logo.gif
edit
Image:River landing logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
