This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cognitive scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Cognitive scienceTemplate:WikiProject Cognitive scienceCognitive science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I understand why it was applied; it is true that the WL article on Varignon's theorem calls it part of mechanics, which is, I believe, part of the problem. It seems to me that it is more a matter of pure mathematics, which can be applied to mechanics, and also to psychometrics if they are approached through a model based on ae concepts physical analogy. The scholarly articles I see on a fast Google talk about "slipperiness" as a measure of certitude of correctness. This is not my field, so I could be wrong, but I am fairly certain of this reading. I would like to see the concepts better explained however; I can just barely decipher this and usually I love technical stuff like this. I will try to bring the article to the attention of some appropriate wikiproject. I am just a wikignome who showed up because of the unlinked and orphan tags. Elinruby (talk) 11:47, 7 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
