Talk:Ripton, Vermont

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

No proof Durst lived in Ripton edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The problem with suggestions that Robert Durst lived in Ripton, or worked in Middlebury, is that there is no proof of any of this to date, other than largely-anonymous hearsay.

I encourage people to call the town of Ripton; as of this writing, they have been unable to discover any evidence of Durst owning or renting a property. Likewise, the store he allegedly owned in Middlebury, VT--"All Good Things"--has generated zero documentation showing any such ownership. In fact, in 1971 (when it is claimed Durst owned All Good Things), the store was not even called All Good Things--it was called OM Natural Health Foods. Digressing now, but wanted to give supporting evidence to my claim that evidence for Durst in Vermont is sorely lacking. 144.92.99.227 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)ZephyrReply

Add topic