Talk:Riesling/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by OhanaUnited

After reviewing this article per GA Sweeps, I believe that this article can maintain its GA status. Here're some minor issues that I think needs to be addressed sooner or later. There are many red-links in Crosses, but I guess someone will create these articles later. There should be references in Naming, but these uncited claims are not controversial. Please try to fix them to make its way to FA. OhanaUnitedTalk page 21:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply