Talk:Riemann–Lebesgue lemma

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 83.130.90.163 in topic Does this hold for complex z?

which "special cases" in proof?

edit

The first sentence of the proof is confusing, and it is not clear which "special cases" it refers to, and which if any of them is the "first one". Perhaps it could be replaced with something like the following:

"The proof can be organized into steps, proving increasingly general special cases; the 4th step extends the result to the original formulation."

but personally I think that it might be better to remove that sentence altogether --AmitAronovitch (talk) 18:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The statement of the Theorem seems to be flawed. f is assumed to be a measurable function from R to C. But the proof deals with an interval [a,b]. Should we say f:[a,b] to C? or should the proof omit [a,b]? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.45.52 (talk) 01:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Also the proof is only for f on R, while the statement of the theorem has f on R^d — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bzhao2017 (talkcontribs) 04:10, 2 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Abstract measure spaces

edit

The proof in the research gate article is wrong, the reference was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.243.243.97 (talk) 21:10, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Does this proof work?

edit

The lemma is first proof for step functions but is applied to g a simple function. It is not explain how we can jump from step function to simple function and it seems unclear (and difficult) to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:861:3DC3:44B0:A07:DFC0:8480:1E9 (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Deficient proof

edit

The theorem says the domain of   is   but the proof works only for   Michael Hardy (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Does this hold for complex z?

edit

This proof only seems to work for real z. In fact, I think that along the imaginary axis the theorem does not hold.

Perhaps this should be stated explicitly — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.130.90.163 (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)Reply