Talk:Ridgedale Center/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 11:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
GA criteria
editWith the issues listed below addressed, this article now fully complies with MOS policies concerning grammar, along with general layout/formatting. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
The article is well-referenced with reputable sources; the content is not left in want of citations. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
The article appears to cover all encyclopedic aspects of its topic for which reliable information could be accessed. All areas of the topic are balanced and devoid of cruft. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
The article keeps a consistently neutral tone, throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Since it's creation a near 9-1/2 years ago, there has been no disruptive editing within this article. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
As mentioned on the information page for the image used in the article, it is (at present) irreplaceable with regards to the purpose it serves, and is furthermore adequately equipped with license and fair-use rationale. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Comments
edit- "2007–present: Renovations and Nordstrom opens": Nothing in this section mentions that a Nordstrom outlet has officially opened at this mall, to-date. Since the concept of a Nordstrom store is still inherently central to this section, and in keeping with the titles of the sections above it, I would suggest omitting "opens" from the header.
Done Carbrera (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- I find myself confused by the line, "... these plans allowed both Macy's current anchor of 202,000 square feet (19,000 m2) to combine into one larger, 286,000 square feet (27,000 m2) location." Where does the "both" tie in? If Macy's had 202,000 square feet before the combination, where did the other 84,000 square feet come in? Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Done I have reworded the line accordingly. Carbrera (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Wilhelmina Will: I have made all my changes, thank you. Carbrera (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
The article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)