Talk:Richard Barre/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I madae a few minor copy-edits

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All online references checkout, I assume GF for print sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   As broad as possible

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I found a number of redirects in the wikilinks which need addressing.

   OK, I deem this worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Per WP:NOTBROKEN, there isn't any need to fix redirects, however. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

OK, I just thought taht you might like to fix them. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

I used to until I got chastised for fixing them ... Thanks for the review! Ealdgyth - Talk 22:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)