Talk:Revolution (book)
Latest comment: 9 years ago by 82.136.210.153 in topic Reception section biased
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revolution (book) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
External links
editI recognize that there are too many external links and reviews are no longer acceptable per WP:EL so I"m parking them here and maybe they can be used as sources.
- Editorial in The Guardian
- Review in The Guardian
- Review in the Daily Mail
- Review in The Daily Mash
- Review in The Telegraph
- Review in The Register
- -- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:54, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Reception section biased
editCurrently, the § Reception section is mostly negative. The comments by The Independent and Owen Jones mentioned at Russell Brand#Writing could be added here to make the whole thing less biased. --82.136.210.153 (talk) 05:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)