Talk:Retroviral psi packaging element
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from Human_immunodeficiency_virus_type_1_dimerization_initiation_site was copied or moved into Retroviral_Psi_packaging_element with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| Text and/or other creative content from Human_immunodeficiency_virus_type_1_major_splice_donor was copied or moved into Retroviral_Psi_packaging_element with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| Text and/or other creative content from Human_immunodeficiency_virus_type_1_stem-loop_3_Psi_packaging_signal was copied or moved into Retroviral_Psi_packaging_element with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Untitled
editWith reference to the merging- I dont think there is enough information at the moment to warrant four separate pages (one for each stem loop). All 4 pages refer to stem loops which together make up the packaging element. Seems sensible to have all on one page at present? Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
I agree it would seem sensible to merge these into a single more comprehensive page. Alexbateman (talk) 09:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- Not sure this is really necessary but trying to follow the rules...Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
Add the copied from to Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 16:16, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Add the copied from to Jennifer_Rfm (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Requested move 25 May 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) buidhe 15:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Retroviral Psi packaging element → Ψ retroviral packaging element – Ψ is the actual proper name of the element itself in the literature. AFAIK Ψ is not a blacklisted character but the system won't let me move it to its actual name. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 09:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose as per MOS:ROMANIZATION. It says
Names not originally written in one of the Latin-script alphabets (written for example in Greek, Cyrillic, or Chinese scripts) must be given a romanized form for use in English.
~Amkgp ✉ 12:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)- But this has always been called Ψ. That's what its written as predominantly in the literature. See also Φ29 DNA polymerase, NF-κB, Ω-logic, π-calculus, Π pad, Π01 class. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support as proposer. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose - I contested this at RMTR, and MOS:ROMANIZATION is clear on this so it shouldn't really be an issue. Article titles are always in Latin text. That's why have Pi not π, Lambda calculus not λ-calculus etc. The examples listed above seem to break the rules, and should be moved. — Amakuru (talk) 11:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.