Talk:Research in lithium-ion batteries
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Electrodes organisation
editI question the organization of the article and made some comments here. Please leave your feedback. Thanks for the additions,--Wyn.junior (talk) 23:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
- I think I fixed it. Lfstevens (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- The entire article should either be chart or paragraphs. I am leaning towards paragraphs become of the volume of info. Why are you grouping them with positive and negative electrodes? There is hardly any info on Wikipedia about pos and neg electrodes.....strange. Thanks for the edits. I'm going to keep at this article.--Wyn.junior (talk) 16:12, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- From what I understand, an electrode is composed of the anode and cathode. There isn't much information about a positive electrode and a negative electrode.--Wyn.junior (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is incorrect. A battery cell has two electrodes. One is the anode and the other the cathode. Lfstevens (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ok. Is one of them the pos and the other the neg electrode?--Wyn.junior (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- Correct!
- Ok. Can we use anode and cathode instead?--Wyn.junior (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have no objection, but others may. Lfstevens (talk) 21:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- I have yet to see pos and neg electrodes be used in the articles I've been reading and writing about. Anode and cathode it is.--Wyn.junior (talk) 02:16, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- I have no objection, but others may. Lfstevens (talk) 21:46, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ok. Can we use anode and cathode instead?--Wyn.junior (talk) 17:01, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
- Correct!
- Ok. Is one of them the pos and the other the neg electrode?--Wyn.junior (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is incorrect. A battery cell has two electrodes. One is the anode and the other the cathode. Lfstevens (talk) 15:03, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Breakthrough
editIt take one of the tech giants to bring in the new technology before it is trusted. Once of them brings it in, it is considered a mainstream breakthrough.--Wyn.junior (talk) 22:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Deletions
editSeveral items have gone from the table in recent days without explanation. What's up with that? Lfstevens (talk) 04:01, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Lacking references. Repost if you believe the references are ok.--Wyn.junior (talk) 02:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
Im having a hard time with the scientific sources.
editChart
edit| Technology | Density | Durability | Researchers | Target application | Date | Benefit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cobalt-oxide nanowires from genetically modified virus | MIT | 2006 | density, thickness[1] | |||
| Three-dimensional (3D) porous particles composed of curved 2D nanolayers | specific energy >2000 mA·h/g | Georgia Institute of Technology | high energy batteries for electronics and electrical vehicles | 2011 | high efficiency, rapid low-cost synthesis[2] | |
| Silicon whisker on carbon nanofiber composite | 800-1000mA·h/g | Junqing Ma, Physical sciences, Inc. | portable electronics, electrical vehicles, electrical grid | 2009 | high capacity, good cycle life, fast rate, low charge time[3] | |
| Silicon nanotubes (or silicon nanospheres) confined within rigid carbon outer shells | 2400 mA·h/g | Georgia Institute of Technology, MSE, NanoTech Yushin's group | stable high energy batteries for cell phones, laptops, netbooks, radios, sensors and electrical vehicles | 2010 | ultra-high Coulombic Efficiency and outstanding SEI stability[4] | |
| Silicon oxycarbide-coated carbon nanotubes | ~225 mA·h/g at 1.6A/g; ~750 mA·h/g at 50 mA/g | Kansas State University[5] | Automotive | 2013 | ~99.6 % average coulombic efficiency; Negative electrode active weight (1.0 mg/cm2), Thickness (~125 micrometers) |
References
- ^ Nam, K. T.; Kim, D. W.; Yoo, P. J.; Chiang, C. Y.; Meethong, N.; Hammond, P. T.; Chiang, Y. M.; Belcher, A. M. (2006). "Virus-Enabled Synthesis and Assembly of Nanowires for Lithium Ion Battery Electrodes". Science. 312 (5775): 885–888. doi:10.1126/science.1122716. PMID 16601154.
- ^ Evanoff, K.; Magasinski, A.; Yang, J.; Yushin, G. (2011). "Nanosilicon-Coated Graphene Granules as Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries". Advanced Energy Materials. 1 (4): 495. doi:10.1002/aenm.201100071.
- ^ "Silicon Whisker and Carbon Nanofiber Composite Anode" (PDF). NASA BAttery Workshop 2009. 17 November 2009. Retrieved November 2009.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help) - ^ Hertzberg, B.; Alexeev, A.; Yushin, G. (2010). "Deformations in Si−Li Anodes Upon Electrochemical Alloying in Nano-Confined Space". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 132 (25): 8548–8549. doi:10.1021/ja1031997. PMID 20527882.
- ^ Bhandavat, R.; Singh, G. (2013). "Stable and Efficient Li-Ion Battery Anodes Prepared from Polymer-Derived Silicon Oxycarbide–Carbon Nanotube Shell/Core Composites". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C: 130531122619008. doi:10.1021/jp310733b.
--Wyn.junior (talk) 03:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Each row has a source. What is the issue? Lfstevens (talk) 07:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- I don't understand what the source is saying. Not plane English.--Wyn.junior (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well the scientific sources are decent papers, so not sure if there is anything that should be changed. I do question, however, how this selection was made. It's not as if these are particularly interesting or novel papers compared to a lot of other literature out there. Ischariot ucl (talk) 08:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- I don't understand what the source is saying. Not plane English.--Wyn.junior (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Sources not scientific
editThe article uses mostly sources from popular media that take over every hopeful announcement without checking. Additional information about the downsides of each technology would be welcome. Sdk16420 (talk) 08:45, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Needs rewrite
editThis page is blurb after blurb summarizing a churnalism report based on a press release from a university or other research institution.
This is pretty much the definition of WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Our poor readers..
The page should be based on reviews and summarize trends and goals and provide a sense of where things are. There should be nothing about what some university scientists did in a small scale in their lab and hoopla was created around it. Jytdog (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)