Talk:Reduction in rank

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Reduction in rank article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Culture

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military culture, traditions, and heraldry task force

Untitled

Bold textWhat ucmj guidlines cover reduction in rank with no punishment involved.Voluntary reduction from e-4 to e-3.

Merge with cashiering?

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Don't merge; reduction in rank and cashiering are significantly different. Pol098 (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merge: They are the same thing

Add topic