Talk:Rebound (dating)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Princeton paper edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The princeton paper doesn't say what this page claims it says. "This paper has a single straightforward finding: there is no rebound effect" also it's not peer reviewed, not sure if that's important 75.119.228.7 (talk) 04:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

I modified the summary to reflect what the paper actually says: no evidence found of a rebound effect. There's no information about the paper's author in the link, but the author appears to be: Nicholas H. Wolfinger, University of Utah based on: http://paa2006.princeton.edu/sessionViewer.aspx?sessionId=259 http://paa2006.princeton.edu/abstractViewer.aspx?submissionId=61125 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.185.161.58 (talk) 07:53, 7 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wrong Headline edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Below the headline Psychology the article describes two referneces. However, none use studies from psychological science. One is from an Tania Gabrielle is describes as an astrologer, numerologist, and psychic and the other article is from Communication Studies. There is no psychological work referenced. 89.144.221.75 (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic