Talk:Rawalpindi Division
Latest comment: 8 years ago by EdJohnston in topic Requested move 16 September 2015
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 16 September 2015 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved since Rawalpindi is in Pakistan. It should follow the pattern of capitalization used for the Pakistan divisions. I had wrongly assumed it was in India when I opened this discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 21:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Rawalpindi division → Rawalpindi Division – Administrative territorial entities have the class name capitalized in the English Wikipedia. This is also true for all other items in Category:Divisions of Pakistan. – 91.9.102.194 (talk) 17:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: The divisions of Pakistan are in title case, like Peshawar Division. At present the Category:Divisions of India are in sentence case., which is wrong according to the IP who has proposed this move. The proponent says "Administrative territorial entities have the class name capitalized in the English Wikipedia". In my opinion this claim needs a reference to a guideline. EdJohnston (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Rawalpindi Division is in Pakistan. The handling within in WikiProject India is irrelevant. The request was to revert an undiscussed move. User:EdJohnston - you failed to comply. 91.9.102.194 (talk) 20:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.