Talk:RSGC1
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Klbrain in topic RSGC1-F01 and -F02 merge proposal
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the RSGC1-F02 page were merged into RSGC1 on 7 December 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the RSGC1-F01 page were merged into RSGC1 on 7 December 2023. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
RSGC1-F01 and -F02 merge proposal edit
These stars do not meet WP:NASTRO; they do not have much coverage in any scientific articles other than a few mentions in tables and figures. SpaceImplorerExplorerImplorer (talk) 19:11, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- They should be given sections like RSGC1-F13. The articles themselves include information that could easily be condensed into table format so there's no reason for them to be full-blown articles. VY Canis Majoris (talk) 07:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yep. The Space Enthusiast (talk) 18:47, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
