Talk:RIM-67 Standard

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Wfoj3 in topic Operational History

Title edit

Please note that a discussion is ongoing at Talk:RIM-161 Standard missile 3, as to whether the "M" in missile should be capitalised. Seeing as this could affect this article, I feel that it should be mentioned here. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 22:30, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Foreign (non-USA) Use edit

Should add to list the Foreign users/ships. I believe it is a short list- only 2 Italian ships. 74.214.40.18 (talk) 19:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'll research non-USN ships with Terrier systems that were modified to fire the RIM-67A Standard. Two way time (talk) 03:43, 1 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

RIM-156A (ex-RIM-67E) SM-2ER Block IV edit

I say that missile should have its own separate page. That missile with its booster I believe is only 18 feet long (max possible in Mk 41 VLS launcher). As you see original RIM-67 and Mk 10 GMLS handled a longer missile. RIM-156A (ex-RIM-67E) SM-2ER Block IV booster is Totally different. I do not know original idea of this missile- was it envy by the Aegis and VLS community over the SM/ER missile range and an effort to try and match it. Or was the origin of this from the BMD efforts. Wfoj3 (talk) 23:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on RIM-67 Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Operational History edit

Currently has 3 paragraphs, entries- Only the first applies here, the other 2 should be moved to RIM-66 - for which those cases apply. Wfoj3 (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply