Talk:RAF Worcester

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RAF Worcester article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Worcestershire Low‑importance

	Worcestershire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alignment of runways edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Do we have a source for the runway being aligned 12/30?

Looking at contemporary mapping (https://maps.nls.uk/view/120900538) would seem to say that this is a typo as, while the runway's not marked it looks like 03/21 would be more correct as that;s the long axis of the "empty" space?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by RFT (talk • contribs) 12:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic