This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RAF Bassingbourn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from 2484 (Bassingbourn) Squadron was copied or moved into RAF Bassingbourn with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Sources
editI could not locate a definitive source for the history of this station. The article reflects details gleaned from a variety of text and visual sources. Havelaar's book was excellent for its aerial photographs of Bassingbourn. Roger Freeman provided details of Class A standards and construction dates. The RAF squadron history acted as a "reverse directory" for details on the base. The ATF Bassingbourn website was invaluable for gelling it all together and I hope someone will do a related article on ATF Bassingbourn (I don't know if I can do it justice, although I am fascinated by a regiment that targets basic training specifically for 16-year-old recruits). I do want to give credit to the 91st Bomb Group Association web page. On its extensive page of stories about the 91st was an article by Kathleen Dodkin, who was a secretary for John Laing & Son during the building of the airfield in 1937-38.--Buckboard 13:13, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- The best source is Bassingbourn (Airfield Focus No 2) by Hamlin, John F. and Simons, Graham M. Publ. GMS Enterprises, Bretton, Peterborough, UK. 1992. Yes, it's a book you have to find in a library. Sorry, I don't have a copy.--Lidos (talk) 08:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Photos
editThanx for the photographs--they add much to the article. However their captions were incorrect in a number of ways and were corrected. BTW, the first number of the serial number on the tail is the year, i.e. 231909 is (19)42-31909.--Buckboard 06:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
94th Bombardment Group
editI addded a link to 94th_Bombardment_Wing_(World_War_II) but this page 3.2 refers to it as a Group? Which is correct?--Lidos (talk) 08:36, 26 February 2014 (UTC)