Talk:Quia timet

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Aside from Totorious examples of this injunction (quia timet)can someone provide scenarios and legal precedents in Equity with regards to this injunction?

Merger proposal edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am wondering if Quia timet injunctions in English law should be merged into Quia timet. It seems the content of Quia timet is based on English common law, rather than having any input from other jurisdictions. Its history is also longer than the one edit history in Quia timet injunctions in English law. Anyone available to follow-up? I bet my research workload will forbid me to visit this page again within next 2 months. Many thanks. akoo (talk) 12:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic