Talk:Quantum (comics)

Untitled

GET BUSY YOU LAZIES AND EXPAND THIS ARTICLE! IT HARDLY CONTAINS ANY INFORMATION! GET BUSY NOW! DON'T WAIT! NOW! 4.159.5.18 02:38, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

It's not polite to talk like that on Wikipedia. Even if the pages aren't being edited, you should try talking to the editors on the comics talk pages, rather than yelling. Scorpionman 20:16, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

Or, y'know, do some research make some contributions yourself.... Dr Archeville 21:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:23, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Quantum (comics)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

== B-class article == No creator information Not enough issue references No publication history No image (one was added, but was for a different character) Superherobox needs to be updated to latest revision Having said all of that... The fictional character biography appears to be complete and accurate. I'm not aware of any important appearances/events that have been omitted. The powers and abilities section might need rewording, but is generally not bad. I think the language and format is ok, although as some of the edits were mine, I may be biased on this. --Mrph 07:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Last edited at 07:40, 26 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 03:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)