Talk:Quagga catshark

Quagga catshark has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 26, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Sharks Low‑importance

	Sharks portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sharks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sharks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SharksWikipedia:WikiProject SharksTemplate:WikiProject Sharksshark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fishes Low‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: Somalia Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Somalia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Somalia (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Quagga catshark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FunkMonk (talk · contribs) 11:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I will review this article. FunkMonk (talk) 11:02, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
"which resemble those of its namesake." Couldn't hurt to just write "which resemble those of the quagga." It is a bit too cryptic now, for no apparent reason.

Done.

Perhaps "known only from nine specimens caught off southwestern India and eastern Somalia" would make more sense after "Little is known of the quagga catshark's natural history". It looks kind of misplaced where it is now (along with the taxonomic stuff).

Moved the phrase.

Since so few specimens are known, it could be interesting to add where the ones pictured are from, as each would be of importance.

Added to captions. They're all Indian specimens.

"along with three upper and one lower tooth rows" reads a bit odd.

Rephrased to "in addition, there are three tooth rows at the upper symphysis (jaw midpoint) and one row at the lower".

Let me know of further issues. -- Yzx (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

It looks good to me now, so I will pass it. Nice work. FunkMonk (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. -- Yzx (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic